1,921 to 1,930 of 2,942 Results
Tab-Delimited - 3.6 KB - MD5: 4445a69519e5b65abdb1457ecf8c5790
|
Tab-Delimited - 2.3 KB - MD5: 69c217d542814e166eb5025d67d48ef7
|
Tab-Delimited - 6.9 KB - MD5: b82831c71d6b4d817bb3a887322677ce
|
RAR Archive - 2.5 KB - MD5: 62b356b6a2fe8012385ee8436b75158b
List of 1131 proteins established as core, present in all the non-Saccharomyces genomes analysed |
Plain Text - 3.3 KB - MD5: 9bcd61f1318ea91f1dae36a2463b5c4c
|
RAR Archive - 299.1 MB - MD5: ae7edef5e9e9fd788d95cbcd7cb30374
For the genomes downloaded from SRA database (raw data; without assembled version available), assembly was performed using SPAdes Genome Assembler software v.3.15.4 (Bankevich et al. 2012), using default parameters. |
RAR Archive - 1.2 GB - MD5: 7cd4ab27f7ed6e9c56b22b118fa8cb37
The 661 assembled genomes were annotated using AUGUSTUS software v.3.4.0 (Stanke and Morgenstern 2005), considering 16 different pre-trained models, chosen as belonging to the Ascomycota phyla (11) or the Basidiomycota phyla (5): Ascomycota – S. cerevisiae S288c, C. albicans, Mey... |
RAR Archive - 889.4 MB - MD5: 90a5a5170220edf89555cc8702e0ee97
A consensus proteome database was prepared by considering the 530 complete genomes (from 134 species) that passed the quality control. |
RAR Archive - 12.2 MB - MD5: 89d3865b483ca694fbb6efece0f3c6f3
Functional genomic annotation was performed using three tools, for increased robustness, as being the three most used tools available for functional annotation: i) eggNOG-mapper v.5.0 (Jensen et al. 2008); ii) kofamKOALA v. 2022-04-03 (Aramaki et al. 2020); iii) KAAS-KEEG Automat... |
RAR Archive - 1.6 MB - MD5: b45a83c6a10236349ca433765fff1c80
Gene function predictions were also accomplished by assessing the Carbohydrate-Active EnZymes (CAZymes) database (Cantarel et al. 2009), using dbCAN2 software (Zhang et al. 2018), testing three different annotation tools to increase robustness, HMMER, eCAMI and DIAMOND, and compi... |

